From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 34715 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2016 11:38:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 34695 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jan 2016 11:38:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:38:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 756FA6E793; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u0LBcV4b032117; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 06:38:32 -0500 Message-ID: <56A0C337.3020800@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:38:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: C++ conversion status update References: <565460FB.6070103@redhat.com> <290689073.6kaHW0HruR@ralph.baldwin.cx> <569F6B1D.60406@redhat.com> <3244238.TJBgqNL2lm@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <3244238.TJBgqNL2lm@ralph.baldwin.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On 01/20/2016 11:33 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 11:10:21 AM Pedro Alves wrote: >> Indeed, thanks for noticing this. I've sent a patch now: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-01/msg00469.html >> >> Could you give it a try? > > Yes, that works well. Great, this bit is now in. (I'll get back to the ptrace issue separately.) Thanks, Pedro Alves