Re: C++ conversion status update

Pedro Alves
2016-04-18T17:29:39Z

On 04/13/2016 03:40 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 04/13/2016 03:16 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:

>> We could do that indeed; or, IIRC, there is a configure option
>> to force the use of C instead of C++.
>
> It's --enable-build-with-cxx=yes|no. That hunk above decides
> the default for when the --enable-build-with-cxx option is not
> specified.
>
> I don't mind requiring
>> the user to force it; it's a good reminder (and ties in nicely
>> with another comment below).
>
> Hmm. That's an excellent point. If others are OK with it, I'm in
> favor too.

I've posted a patch that does this now.

https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-04/msg00417.html
Thanks,
Pedro Alves