From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24263 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2015 19:27:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24209 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2015 19:27:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:27:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E7A3679CC; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t68JQvIA000306; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:26:58 -0400 Message-ID: <559D7981.3070901@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:27:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Sherrill , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: delete target dbug/picobug/dink32/m32r/mon2000 ? References: <559D6FB0.9070103@redhat.com> <559D757A.9020707@oarcorp.com> In-Reply-To: <559D757A.9020707@oarcorp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On 07/08/2015 08:09 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > DINK32 was/is a free ROM monitor from Motorola > (now Freescale). I am not sure it is is available > or not. I haven't seen it in years personally. Thanks. > > I would expect microblaze-rom.c to be the newest user > of these. Yeah, seems like it, added in 2009. TBC, I'm not suggesting to remove any architecture support. It should still be fine to debug microblaze, m68k/CF, etc. with "target remote". > I agree these are very likely dead. Thanks, Pedro Alves