From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24432 invoked by alias); 10 May 2009 13:45:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 24419 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2009 13:45:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from web36202.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO web36202.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.68.228) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Sun, 10 May 2009 13:45:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 87905 invoked by uid 60001); 10 May 2009 13:45:05 -0000 Message-ID: <55454.86962.qm@web36202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [124.125.223.123] by web36202.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2009 06:45:04 PDT Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:45:00 -0000 From: paawan oza Subject: Re: MMX and floating point insn suport for reversible debugging To: Hui Zhu Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb ml , Pedro Alves , Marc Khouzam , Michael Snyder , Eli Zaretskii , Mark Kettenis MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 Hi Hui, dont we need to save FPU flags also, while saving floating point registers? for e.g. instruction FMUL/FMULP/FIMUL=E2=80=94Multiply ; aafter the result, FPU flags may get affected=20 as follows. FPU Flags Affected C1 Set to 0 if stack underflow occurred. Set if result was rounded up; cleared otherwise. C0, C2, C3 Undefined. what is you opinion ? Regards, Oza.