From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125824 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2015 16:09:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 125808 invoked by uid 89); 3 Apr 2015 16:09:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 16:09:08 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Ye49Y-0002Px-Oq from Don_Breazeal@mentor.com ; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 09:09:04 -0700 Received: from [172.30.0.1] (147.34.91.1) by SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 09:09:01 -0700 Message-ID: <551EBB19.8090001@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 16:09:00 -0000 From: "Breazeal, Don" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Cody , "Breazeal, Don" CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: gdbserver follow-fork mode References: <551D8FC8.4020609@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On 4/2/2015 10:51 PM, Aaron Cody wrote: > thanks Don - so can you give an indication as to 'how far along' the > work is? Is it worth me doing a patched build now? .. is it mostly > there or what? > thanks > A Aaron -- it's probably not complete enough yet. For example, any of the patches supporting remote exec events are way out of date at this point. Since most of the time a fork is followed by an exec, the current patches wouldn't be enough for useful work. --Don > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Breazeal, Don wrote: >> On 4/2/2015 12:44 AM, Aaron Cody wrote: >>> I was reading that 'work is continuing' on this .. any idea when it >>> might be ready? >>> >> It's difficult to predict. There is progress, and active work that you >> can track on gdb-patches if you are interested. >> --Don