From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 65765 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2015 23:58:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 65754 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2015 23:58:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:58:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1RNwnvO002167 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:58:49 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1RNwlO2007638; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:58:48 -0500 Message-ID: <54F104B7.3070401@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 07:28:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Howarth CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: many -Wincompatible-pointer-types on clang with gdb-7.9 References: <54F0DC99.5020904@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 On 02/27/2015 11:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Pedro, > I see... > > #ifdef BUILDING_LIBGUILE > typedef SCM (* scm_t_subr) (); > #else > typedef void (*scm_t_subr)(); > #endif > > for the current guile 2.0.11 release. Thanks. Not complaining, really. That's pedantically more correct as assignment between function pointer and 'void *' is invalid ISO C (though POSIX makes it valid, because dlsym). Thanks, Pedro Alves