From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
To: <gdb@sourceware.org>
Cc: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
Subject: how to fix internal errors on connection to remote stub?
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C2893B.5000900@codesourcery.com> (raw)
We have a GDB stub we use to interface to various hardware probes. In
GDB we normally run programs on the target using a series of commands like
(gdb) target remote ....
(gdb) load
(gdb) c
This works about 99.9% of the time. The other .1%, we get "a problem
internal to GDB has been detected" from the "target remote" command,
because it is trying to ask the target for a backtrace *before* it has
loaded the program. At that point, the contents of memory and registers
on the target have no relation to the program gdb is trying to debug,
and GDB gets mighty confused. Maybe this isn't so awful for manual use,
but it certainly screws up automated testing.
Luis and I have been discussing this and we both think the most likely
solution is for the stub to answer the initial '?' packet with some
response that indicates it's in an inconsistent state, rather than the
"S00" it is sending now, and have GDB recognize it and at least suppress
the initial backtrace, and perhaps also sets a flag disallowing other
commands to view target state (variable values, etc) until it's cleared
by the "load" command. Maybe the 'W' stop reply could be used for this
purpose, or maybe we need to introduce a new one?
Alternatively, maybe we could have a separate GDB command that can be
issued before the "target remote" to suppress the auto-backtrace?
Any other ideas? What do other folks think is the right solution? We'd
much rather fix this in a way that's acceptable for mainline rather than
having to carry a patch locally.
-Sandra
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 18:07 Sandra Loosemore [this message]
2015-01-23 19:37 ` Paul Koning
2015-01-25 5:54 ` Sandra Loosemore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C2893B.5000900@codesourcery.com \
--to=sandra@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox