From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16319 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 19:22:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16181 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 19:21:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mirapoint.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 19:21:52 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (diup-218-90.inter.net.il [213.8.218.90]) by mirapoint.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BFC00610; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:21:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:22:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Message-Id: <5402-Tue19Feb2002211902+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200202191745.RAA29591@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> (message from Richard Earnshaw on Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:45:15 +0000) Subject: Re: ARI and DUP filenames Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200202191745.RAA29591@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00247.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:45:15 +0000 > From: Richard Earnshaw > > Does this script go round fixing up all makefile etc references as > well? No, it doesn't change the Makefile's, since the renamed files are not used in the MS-DOS (a.k.a. DJGPP, a.k.a. go32) build of GDB. They are only renamed to allow the tarball to be unpacked without overwriting files. (The TAGS targets are screwed by this, but I doubt that many DJGPP users use TAGS. I have a plan to fix this as well some time.) > Or do I have to add other definitions elsewhere for that? You don't need to do anything beyond updating fnchange.lst. One request: when you invent the 8+3-clean names, please look how similar names are dealt with on fnchange.lst, and do something along the same lines. TIA