From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2002 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2014 09:05:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1980 invoked by uid 89); 21 Aug 2014 09:05:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:05:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7L94rcV017432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:04:53 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7L94oDB003860; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:04:51 -0400 Message-ID: <53F5B631.1080005@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:05:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker , Mike Frysinger CC: gdb@sourceware.org, Joel Sherrill , Anthony Green Subject: Re: integrating dtc into the sim/ tree References: <53F27ADC.4070609@oarcorp.com> <1850909.FvmpfGFofc@vapier> <20140820160635.GK4828@adacore.com> <2642309.RSytPSsbtK@vapier> <20140821073234.GM4828@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20140821073234.GM4828@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2 Hi guys, On 08/21/2014 08:32 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I would perhaps poll the other GDB GMs to make sure they also have > no objection to it. I have no objections. Good points were raised and addressed, and Mike's reasoning is very convincing. Thanks, Pedro Alves