Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Raphael Zulliger <zulliger@indel.ch>,
	"gdb@sourceware.org"	<gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Performance issue of -var-list-children on structs with many members and remote targets
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E4A6F8.1000905@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E47B59.3060700@indel.ch>

On 08/08/2014 03:25 PM, Raphael Zulliger wrote:
> Now my simple question: Couldn't GDB be tweaked to get the struct member 
> values by just one call (because members within a struct are guaranteed 
> to be consecutive, aren't they?):
> 
> 499,883 38-var-list-children var2.public
> 499,884 &"Sending packet: $m601050,24#??"
> 
> I guess this would dramatically increase overall performance.
> 
> I would really like to see such an improvement in GDB. Therefore, I'd be 
> very happy to hear your thoughts and suggestion. Thinks like: What 
> problems (e.g. border cases) could arise when implementing this? Where 
> to start in the GDB code for such a modification? Or do there exist any 
> GDB switches to improve performance on such operations? etc...

I have no idea how to merge multiple reads into one.

Cache is used in GDB to read code and stack from target, which
increases performance to some extent (See target_read_code and
target_read_stack).  However, cache is NOT used to read general data.
Probably, you can make general data reading use cache too.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-08 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-08  7:25 Raphael Zulliger
2014-08-08 10:35 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2014-08-11 14:57   ` Raphael Zulliger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E4A6F8.1000905@codesourcery.com \
    --to=yao@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=zulliger@indel.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox