From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11715 invoked by alias); 30 May 2014 08:45:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11697 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2014 08:45:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 08:45:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4U8ja83017107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 May 2014 04:45:36 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4U8jYsq004626; Fri, 30 May 2014 04:45:35 -0400 Message-ID: <5388452E.8010809@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:55:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Siddhesh Poyarekar CC: Samuel Bronson , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: patchwork.sourceware.org is live! References: <20140523211338.GK12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <5382E7F2.4020506@suse.com> <5382EF22.4060705@suse.com> <5382F50E.7040702@suse.com> <20140526102052.GA18682@domone> <87d2ewdo60.fsf@naesten.mooo.com> <20140530030029.GN12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <538842FC.3000002@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <538842FC.3000002@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 On 05/30/2014 09:36 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 05/30/2014 04:00 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:56:55PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote: >>> Are there any objections to the new state? >> >> None so far. I have added it to patchwork now. I have not yet made >> 'Accepted' an 'Action Required' state because that will clutter the >> view; I'll do it when I get explicit blessings from more maintainers. > > That's be fine with me (speaking from the gdb side). And I like the > new state. BTW, before (or just after) you make 'Accepted' be 'Action Required', I'd like to bulk change all current GDB 'Accepted' patches to 'Committed', and start making use of 'Accepted' only for new patches. I don't think it's that worth it to go through each and every currently 'Accepted' patch and check whether it's committed manually. We can work on automating that afterwards. But can't do that bulk change with pwclient until the "No authentication credentials given" issue is sorted out. Did you plan on doing such a bulk change from the admin side? -- Pedro Alves