From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6254 invoked by alias); 30 May 2014 08:36:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6234 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2014 08:36:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 08:36:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4U8aEQs028669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 May 2014 04:36:14 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4U8aCii029665; Fri, 30 May 2014 04:36:13 -0400 Message-ID: <538842FC.3000002@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:45:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Siddhesh Poyarekar , Samuel Bronson CC: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: patchwork.sourceware.org is live! References: <20140523211338.GK12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <5382E7F2.4020506@suse.com> <5382EF22.4060705@suse.com> <5382F50E.7040702@suse.com> <20140526102052.GA18682@domone> <87d2ewdo60.fsf@naesten.mooo.com> <20140530030029.GN12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140530030029.GN12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 On 05/30/2014 04:00 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:56:55PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote: >> Are there any objections to the new state? > > None so far. I have added it to patchwork now. I have not yet made > 'Accepted' an 'Action Required' state because that will clutter the > view; I'll do it when I get explicit blessings from more maintainers. That's be fine with me (speaking from the gdb side). And I like the new state. -- Pedro Alves