From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7933 invoked by alias); 26 May 2014 07:06:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7911 invoked by uid 89); 26 May 2014 07:06:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx2.suse.de Received: from cantor2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 26 May 2014 07:06:33 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1144AC0C; Mon, 26 May 2014 07:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5382E7F2.4020506@suse.com> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 07:29:00 -0000 From: Andreas Jaeger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Siddhesh Poyarekar , libc-alpha@sourceware.org CC: gdb@sourceware.org, carlos@redhat.com, fche@redhat.com, gbenson@redhat.com Subject: Re: patchwork.sourceware.org is live! References: <20140523211338.GK12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140523211338.GK12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On 05/23/2014 11:13 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > Hi, > > Frank and I have now completed migration of the patchwork test > instance to patchwork.sourceware.org. I posted a couple of sample > patches to the script directly and they seem to work just fine. All > accounts that were on patchwork.siddhesh.in should continue to work in > the same manner on this instance. > > I urge all glibc maintainers to please sign up and give it a spin. As > of now, Carlos and I have admin rights for glibc and Gary for gdb, so > one of us should be able to add you to the project after you sign up, > after which you can change patch state. Once that is done, please > close patches you know you have already pushed into master. > > Please also take time to review the workflow for patch reviews: > > https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Patch%20Review%20Workflow I have one question: A patch that is merged, should have "Accepted", correct? so, patches that are already committed should be changed to have this... If i just comment on a patch with a "Looks fine", should I say "Under Review" - and then the submitter sets this to "Accepted"? Please document this workflow a bit better, it's confusing to me... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126