From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15324 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2014 17:24:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15297 invoked by uid 89); 12 Mar 2014 17:24:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:24:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2CHNvoI017018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:23:58 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2CHNuHE016635; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:23:57 -0400 Message-ID: <5320982C.2060308@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:24:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: gdb Subject: Re: Cleaning out obsolete bugs in bugzilla References: <53209273.9090407@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 On 03/12/2014 05:10 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > "WONTFIX" could come across with an unintended connotation alright, > but I have no current data to assign a probability to it happening. > At the moment it's just gut feeling, which is why I think there's > benefit to something else that doesn't require much, if any, > discussion, like OBSOLETE. I think OBSOLETE is a good idea. > But I don't have a strong opinion on the > ultimate choice. If people have a strong opinion on not inventing > anything new, fine by me, let's go with WONTFIX until we have real > data that it can be a problem. -- Pedro Alves