From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14766-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17437 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2003 17:47:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17416 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2003 17:47:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CORPIT08.polycom.com) (216.52.12.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jul 2003 17:47:43 -0000
Received: by CORPIT08.polycom.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <NS5PRGXB>; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:48:43 -0700
Message-ID: <5314B62255397440B12213B31CB2E9F113CD32@corpmail02>
From: "Pavoori, Kiran" <kiran.pavoori@polycom.com>
To: "'drow@mvista.com'" <drow@mvista.com>, "'gdb@sources.redhat.com'"
	 <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: nested namespace and enum
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:47:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2

Would like to hear an opinion on this declaration.

namespace N
{
class C 
{
    public:
        ~C(){}
        C() {}
        typedef enum 
        {
                EV_X,
                EV_Y, 
                EV_Z
        } Events;
};
}


Now looking at the above declaration I would access the enum EV_X as
follows:

N::C::EV_X

Is this an acceptable declaration?
Please comment when you get a chance, thank-you
Kiran