Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: "alexandru.sardan@freescale.com" <alexandru.sardan@freescale.com>
Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>,
	       "catalin.udma@freescale.com" <catalin.udma@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: 'g' packet reply is too long error when target changes number of registers
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F1351F.8090608@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5651102df70243a088e7688170617c31@DM2PR03MB368.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

On 02/03/2014 02:11 PM, alexandru.sardan@freescale.com wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm trying to debug an ARM Aarch64 target with gdb-cross and I get a
> 'g' packet reply is too long error in the following scenario:
> 
> * I debug my ARM target through a probe that has a gdbserver running on it
> (gdbproxy).
> * First I load a custom target description in gdb that reflects the current 
> hardware I am debugging
> * I connect to the probe with "target remote probe_ip"
> * Then I configure the probe to connect to the target (using the same target
> description as the one loaded in GDB)
> * When I ask for the register Info (info reg), I get the 'g' packet reply 
> error.
> 

> Because the probe had no knowledge of the target that will be debugged 
> beforehand, the "target remote" command will force the probe to reply with 
> info about a smaller number of registers (according to the default description)
> than gdb expects.

This sounds odd.  Why not?  Simply configure it before connecting
with GDB?  It sounds quite wrong to be changing the target behind
GDB's back when GDB is _already_ debugging it.  Not just the size
of the g/G packets may change inadvertently, but the layout as well.
If the target description changes with your re-configuration, it
sounds to me like GDB should fetch/recompute the whole target
description.  Today, I think that can only be done with a
disconnect/reconnect.

> This causes rsa->sizeof_g_packet to be reduced.
> 
> After configuration, the probe will send all the register information of the 
> target. This causes the 'g'packet reply error because now, more registers 
> are being sent.

> 
> Why is rsa->sizeof_g_packet shrunk when a smaller packet is received.

  /* If this is smaller than we guessed the 'g' packet would be,
     update our records.  A 'g' reply that doesn't include a register's
     value implies either that the register is not available, or that
     the 'p' packet must be used.  */
  if (buf_len < 2 * rsa->sizeof_g_packet)
    {

If we don't shrink it, then we'd send too much when writing
registers, for example, I think?

-- 
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-04 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-03 14:12 alexandru.sardan
2014-02-04 18:44 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2014-02-05 14:07   ` alexandru.sardan
2014-02-05 14:56     ` Pedro Alves
2014-02-05 15:14       ` alexandru.sardan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52F1351F.8090608@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexandru.sardan@freescale.com \
    --cc=catalin.udma@freescale.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox