From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Ivo Raisr <ivosh@ivosh.net>
Cc: <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Multi-packet gdb server request/response - problem?
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A84F73.3010300@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANXv6=u1BjBdJJDNtF=j=djNJVoNHo45gL4JZruzDYsaSqEU6Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/10/2013 08:22 PM, Ivo Raisr wrote:
> Sending packet: $s#73...Sending packet: $mfe7c852c,4#34...Packet
> received: T0505:08f8fe37;04:e8f7fe37;08:4d761100;thread:1;
> Reply contains invalid hex digit 84
>
> Please take a particular note that in this case gdb did not wait for a reply
> to its '$s' packet but instead immediately issued another '$mfe7c852c,4'
> packet.
>
> This is also verified by dumping packets on the other side in the gdb
> server stub implementation:
> - read from gdb $s#73$mfe7c852c,4#34
> - write to gdb $T0505:08f8fe37;04:e8f7fe37;08:4d761100;thread:1;#d8$0*"00#dc
>
> So on the wires it looks like:
> - gdb wrote two requests without waiting for a response for the first one
> - gdb received two concatenated responses for these two requests
> - requests and responses alone look well-formed
>
> My questions are:
> - Is multi-packet request/response supported by gdb?
No. GDB sends out one packet and waits for the response.
> - In other words, is that gdb's behaviour intentional?
No, it is not intentional.
> - If yes, then why it cannot handle multi-packet response?
> - If no, then is that a bug?
I have to say that GDB and the remote stub interact incorrectly. With
the limited information, hard to determine which part cause this
problem.
I forces gdbserver to use 's' packet, but unable to reproduce.
Sending packet: $Hc0#db...Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $s#73...Packet received:
T0505:88efffbf;04:70efffbf;08:f9840408;thread:p7891.7891;core:0;
Sending packet: $z0,80484c1,1#cf...Packet received: OK
--
Yao (é½å°§)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-10 12:23 Ivo Raisr
2013-12-10 21:46 ` Philippe Waroquiers
[not found] ` <CANXv6=vFYfEDLPVHv_TRK4VTLmFX6c+2hvmodM9dg3gcJA4_jQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-12-12 15:14 ` Fwd: " Ivo Raisr
2013-12-12 15:44 ` Ivo Raisr
2013-12-12 16:46 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-11 11:43 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2013-12-14 3:39 Ivo Raisr
2013-12-16 14:31 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A84F73.3010300@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=ivosh@ivosh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox