From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5550 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2013 10:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5344 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2013 10:58:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: service87.mimecast.com Received: from Unknown (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:58:37 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:58:27 +0000 Received: from [10.1.208.33] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:58:26 +0000 Message-ID: <5284ACD1.8090609@arm.com> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:58:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lance Taylor CC: Peter Bergner , Tom Tromey , GDB Development , Binutils Development , Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho Subject: Re: git is live References: <877gd5iyaz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1382709091.5918.9.camel@otta> In-Reply-To: X-MC-Unique: 113111410582712201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 On 25/10/13 14:55, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Peter Bergner wro= te: >> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 01:01 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: >>> The URLs: >>> >>> git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git >>> ssh://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git >> >> Ok, it's probably getting old, but I'll add my thanks >> for switching us over. Now to my question... >> >> >From a policy standpoint, are we going to allow vendor branches >> in the git repo like glibc does? I'm hoping the answer is yes. :) >> We didn't allow it before due to it seems CVS issues, but with git, >> it should now be easy. >=20 > GCC has always allowed vendor branches. I don't see any reason that > binutils/gdb should prohibit them. Obviously all the code has to be > under the GPL or some other explicitly permitted license. I believe the GCC policy is that the code must also be assigned to the FSF, just as it would be for trunk. R.