From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13472 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2013 18:42:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13454 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2013 18:42:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com Received: from caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com (HELO homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:42:32 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBE828406E; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redwood.eagercon.com (c-50-148-128-197.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.148.128.197]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eager@eagerm.com) by homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 626E828405B; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <526EB016.3020904@eagerm.com> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:42:00 -0000 From: Michael Eager User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: gdb-7.6 branch build failures References: <526E8D82.4080700@eagerm.com> <8738nlckrb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <8738nlckrb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2 On 10/28/13 11:28, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Eager writes: > > Michael> Is anyone building gdb_7_6-branch without these errors? > Michael> If not, I'll submit a patch for the branch to turn off > Michael> -Werror for these files. > > If the fix is straightforward, I suggest just back-porting it instead. The Makefile entries for mips-opc.c, etc., already specify $(NO_MISSING_FIELD_INITIALIZERS). Unfortunately, this is null if the version of gcc does not support -Wno-missing-field-initializers. (I'm building on a system with gcc-3.4.6.) I'm working on a patch to configure/configure.in which will change set NO_MISSING_FIELD_INITIALIZERS to -Wno-error if -Wno-missing-field-initializers is not supported. -- Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077