From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31620 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2013 20:36:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 31559 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Feb 2013 20:36:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:36:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1JKaFqT007508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:36:15 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1JKaD5Y026114; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:36:14 -0500 Message-ID: <5123E23D.9010007@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:36:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergio Durigan Junior CC: Debug List , nt_mahmood@yahoo.com, "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Missing separate debuginfos References: <1361295973.55844.YahooMailNeo@web163002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 On 02/19/2013 08:14 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Tuesday, February 19 2013, Mahmood Naderan wrote: > >> > What is the meaning of this message I see in gdb? >> > >> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 >> > 0x00000037d6c0f3cb in raise () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 >> > Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install > It means you don't have the debug information for these specific > packages/versions. Unless you want to debug them, you don't really need > to worry. If you ever want to debug them, you can run the command > suggested. A bit off topic for this list, but I've thought before that message isn't as clear as it could be. > Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install I think we could drop "separate", as it is an implementation detail that shouldn't matter to the user. "debuginfos" being plural reads a bit weird to me. I think this would be a bit clearer: Debug info for packages used by the program missing. Install with: debuginfo-install But of course that may well just be me. -- Pedro Alves