From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10692 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2013 20:43:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 10641 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2013 20:43:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:43:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r11Kh8vU003420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:43:21 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r11K8CkC006758; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:08:13 -0500 Message-ID: <510C20AC.2030307@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:43:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Yao Qi , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: reminder: tentative date for branching is this coming monday... References: <20130131010551.GB3600@adacore.com> <510A4C81.1080507@codesourcery.com> <20130201034206.GX3532@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20130201034206.GX3532@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 On 02/01/2013 03:42 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I would like the "=tsv-modified" MI notification patch >> (http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-01/msg00714.html) goes >> in, because we've already have "=tsv-created" and "=tsv-deleted" and >> good to bundle these three in a release, which is good to MI >> frontend. > > OK. Can you make sure it gets reviewed reasonably quickly, so > as not to delay the branching unreasonably? I guess this in my plate as well. -- Pedro Alves