From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16337 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2003 19:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16315 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2003 19:12:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2003 19:12:27 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA7JCQrY028393 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:12:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from scv1.apple.com (scv1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:11:53 -0800 Received: from [17.219.199.53] ([17.219.199.53]) by scv1.apple.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA7JBuww007850; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:11:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <16299.57026.131736.290504@localhost.redhat.com> References: <1068220826.2391.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <3432BCBC-1148-11D8-8D8B-000A277A8808@apple.com> <16299.57026.131736.290504@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <50DD2B95-1156-11D8-8D8B-000A277A8808@apple.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Jim Ingham Subject: Re: gdb Digest 7 Nov 2003 16:00:26 -0000 Issue 1325 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 19:12:00 -0000 To: Elena Zannoni X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 On Nov 7, 2003, at 10:04 AM, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Jim Ingham writes: >> Elena, >> >> On Nov 7, 2003, at 8:00 AM, gdb-digest-help@sources.redhat.com wrote: >> >>> the objc support is in gdb mainline and it has been there for a >>> while. >>> There are some bugs still, but it was merged. >>> Are you referring to something else? >> >> Yes, I was referring to the very beginnings of Adam's work. Since the >> tarball of the Apple sources were sitting on the FSF site, he >> naturally >> started from there. But since they had been sitting for a while, the >> first task he faced was reconciling the changes in the relevant areas >> of the tarball with the changes in the FSF sources between the time >> the >> tarball was dropped and when he got it. At that time, we were keeping >> pretty current with the FSF distro, so we had done this job already - >> and the results were readily available in our CVS repository. IIRC, >> we >> figured out what was going on pretty quickly and set him straight, but >> that is the sort of pointless duplication of effort that it would be >> good to avoid. >> > > I see. Are you still taking the fsf changes on a regular basis? I > believe that having a source drop represents also kind of a formal > handoff, a sign that Apple was willingly giving some code back to the > community, and at least go through the motions, but maybe that's just > me. We got caught up in the flurry of getting the WWDC & then the Panther releases done, so we are about 8 months behind. Klee is busy rectifying this now, though there have been lots of substantive changes - so it is taking him a little longer than he thought it would. I would suggest waiting another couple of weeks before poking around. Yeah, Andrew said something of the sort last time. The fact that we signed the blanket copyright assignment, and post all the code on a public server with all the proper copyright info in place, plus periodic "Take it, you are welcome..." posts here seem pretty good signs of this to me, however. So I don't see how leaving droppings to rot on your ftp site every so often adds all that much. > >>> >>> Same story for the interpreter stuff which Keith, Andrew and I >>> merged. >>> >> >> I am pretty sure Keith worked from our CVS repository, at least that >> is >> what I urged him to do. By the time you & Andrew got to it, I think >> the work was pretty far along, so you probably didn't have any need to >> refer to our version. > > Yes we worked from the Apple CVS repo. I remember it was quite > cumbersome to get to it though, and I forgot the URL. Yes, for a while the Darwin folks wanted you to get an APSL account to access the repository, so you had to fake an e-mail address, and give them some bogus password. I understand why they did this - getting involved in OpenSource projects was a new thing, and they were trying to get as much supporting info to argue with the more traditional side of the management. But it was a bit of a pain. Fortunately, the relationship with OpenSource is pretty much a done deal at this point, so they have dropped the requirement. > >> >>> I think we went through this before, with the previoius tarball. If >>> it's too hard a requirement, then let's forget about it. We'll live >>> with the status quo. >> >> It is obviously not hard but I worry it is likely to be >> counter-productive. That was what we "went through before" and the >> event somewhat justified my concerns. >> >> Pointing folks at our CVS repository is much easier, and we even have >> anonymous access now for those who don't want to give out their e-mail >> addresses... Plus then they have all the benefits of CVS in trying to >> figure out why we did all the screwy things we did... >> > > ... the pointer is? http://developer.apple.com/darwin/tools/cvs/howto.html Jim _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Jim Ingham jingham@apple.com Developer Tools - gdb