From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32685 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2012 13:25:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 32663 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2012 13:25:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:24:42 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Tgxuy-0006TD-2w from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 05:24:40 -0800 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 05:24:39 -0800 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 05:24:39 -0800 Message-ID: <50C1EE0B.3040905@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:25:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Rice CC: Jan Kratochvil , Mark Kettenis , , Subject: Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? References: <20120330161403.GA17891@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87aa2rjkb8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F8FD047.6030702@codesourcery.com> <20121204141708.GA28600@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201212041444.qB4EiG4L025312@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20121204145144.GA30509@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On 12/07/2012 04:39 AM, Matt Rice wrote: > If anyone has any particularly large change to an existing source > file, and they'd prefer I postpone work on that file until later > please let me know, it might save work for one of us or the other. I have a not-small patch series 'rsp async notification' being reviewed recently and hopefully give new version V4 next Monday. I don't want to postpone your work. How do you change the source tree? Are you going to post patches one by one to fix compilation errors, and finally turn -Wc++-compat on in the last step? -- Yao (齐尧)