From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4110 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2006 07:31:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 4096 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2006 07:31:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mxout.hispeed.ch (HELO smtp.hispeed.ch) (62.2.95.247) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:31:02 +0000 Received: from indel.ch (84-73-11-232.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.11.232]) by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.6/taifun-1.0) with SMTP id kA27Uu9c026389 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:30:56 +0100 Received: from FABI.indel.ch [192.168.1.91] by indel.ch [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP5.R) for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:30:37 +0100 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.1.20061102082926.01811c70@NT_SERVER> X-Sender: cenedese@NT_SERVER (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:31:00 -0000 To: gdb@sourceware.org From: Fabian Cenedese Subject: Re: *SPAM*Re: Memleaks? In-Reply-To: <20061031121636.GA24080@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20061030134510.GB5443@nevyn.them.org> <5.2.0.9.1.20061030123115.0185cec0@NT_SERVER> <20061030134510.GB5443@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gdb@sourceware.org X-Return-Path: cenedese@indel.ch X-Virus-Status: Clean X-DCC-spamcheck-02.tornado.cablecom.ch-Metrics: smtp-06.tornado.cablecom.ch 1378; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 At 07:16 31.10.2006 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 08:45:10AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >>On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:40:56PM +0100, Fabian Cenedese wrote: >>> I admit that I used not a state-of-the-art gdb, but I don't think that >>> this was changed recently. I'd be pleased if you can correct me. >>> >>> GNU gdb 6.2.50_2004-10-14-cvs >> >>This is two years old; I can't really speculate on what has changed >>since then. It may be simple memory leaks, or it may be something more >>complex. > >FWIW, the current Cygwin version of gdb is 6.5+. Which has the same errors. bye Fabi