From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11225 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2006 08:40:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 11216 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2006 08:40:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mxout.hispeed.ch (HELO smtp.hispeed.ch) (62.2.95.247) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 08:40:30 +0000 Received: from indel.ch (84-73-8-49.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.8.49]) by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/taifun-1.0) with SMTP id k338eQTs025877 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:40:26 +0200 Received: from fabi.indel.ch [192.168.1.19] by indel.ch [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP5.R) for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 10:40:14 +0200 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.1.20060403103930.01fb0e60@NT_SERVER> X-Sender: cenedese@NT_SERVER (Unverified) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 08:40:00 -0000 To: gdb@sourceware.org From: Fabian Cenedese Subject: Re: stabs difference gcc 2.95.3 -> 3.4.3 In-Reply-To: <20060331140050.GB27522@nevyn.them.org> References: <5.2.0.9.1.20060331154403.01f90670@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20060330162459.01fbe008@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20060330083638.01f6da00@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20060330083638.01f6da00@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20060330162459.01fbe008@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20060331154403.01f90670@NT_SERVER> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gdb@sourceware.org X-Return-Path: cenedese@indel.ch X-Virus-Status: Clean X-DCC-spamcheck-01.tornado.cablecom.ch-Metrics: smtp-01.tornado.cablecom.ch 32700; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 >> Can I somehow prevent gcc from relaying it to as? Something like >> -Wa,(no, don't do -g)? I didn't find a matching parameter on >> >> http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.16/as/Invoking.html#Invoking > >You're compiling in two steps already; how about not passing -g the >second time? Yeah, I came to that conclusion as well, or even better calling as directly. >> But then again it isn't mentioned either that as would take -g. > >It's translated to --gdwarf-2 or --gstabs. Thanks for your help, I'll shut up now :) bye Fabi