From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20003 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2012 19:51:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 19978 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2012 19:51:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-bk0-f41.google.com) (209.85.214.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 19:51:37 +0000 Received: by bkwq16 with SMTP id q16so3174279bkw.0 for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:51:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.149.204 with SMTP id u12mr4267062bkv.45.1333396295397; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:51:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [87.2.97.201] (host201-97-dynamic.2-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it. [87.2.97.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jr13sm40783090bkb.14.2012.04.02.12.51.31 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F7A0341.9050305@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 19:51:00 -0000 From: Stefano Lattarini MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: ams@gnu.org, iant@google.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, 11034@debbugs.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org, automake@gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, joseph@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option References: <4F72E239.9010404@gmail.com> <4F7301DD.7090401@gmail.com> <4F76C08E.6050707@gmail.com> <4F76D8F2.8050804__46768.5595191599$1333188914$gmane$org@gmail.com> <87zkaujjn1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F79BFDB.1070904@gmail.com> <87ty12i2pd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F79C5F2.2020807__46832.8654104427$1333380662$gmane$org@gmail.com> <87hax2hqop.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87hax2hqop.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 On 04/02/2012 09:36 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Stefano" == Stefano Lattarini writes: > > Stefano> Sorry if I sound dense, but what exactly is the feature you are > Stefano> talking about here? > > I was under the impression that it would no longer be possible to build > info files in the build tree. > It should still be possible, with the right hack (which is tested in the testsuite, and required by other packages anyway). The baseline is: if you don't want your '.info' files to be distributed, then it should be easily possible to have them built in the builddir; but if you want them distributed, they will be built in the srcdir. The rationale to do so is to ensure that, in both cases, the developer's tree layout (as bootstrapped from a VCS checkout) will match the user's tree layout (as obtained from a distribution tarball). > But, I see that, according to the Automake manual, I am wrong about that. > Weird, I didn't expect that hack to be documented in the manual... And in fact I cannot find it. Could you please point me to it? Thanks. > So, sorry for the noise. > Well, better safe than sorry :-) Regards, Stefano