From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21621 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2011 09:48:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 21539 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2011 09:48:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from adoakley.name (HELO ado.is-a-geek.net) (46.4.104.242) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:47:37 +0000 Received: from adoakley.name ([46.4.104.242] helo=flagr.ant.co.uk) by ado.is-a-geek.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QwA1G-0004WF-3Q; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:45:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4E54C8C6.3020309@ado.is-a-geek.net> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Oakley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110309 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Some Python ideas, looking for feedback References: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D583A2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <201108161345.33448.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D585D2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <20110817193710.59945561@ado-gentoo> <20110817201316.64fc14e5@ado-gentoo> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 On 19/08/11 15:13, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > Daniel> I don't suppose we can avoid exposing this internal C wart to Python, > Daniel> and expose it some other way... ? > > I think it depends on whether we have shipped it or not. > If we have, then perhaps someone is using it; in that case I would > rather not break it. Yes, you've shipped it. At least one person is using it (me). I'd prefer it if this didn't go away. > However, even in that case, we can still add a new attribute with a > better name and recommend that people use it. Thats fair enough, but for now can we please get the documentation updated? -- Andrew Oakley