From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31369 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2011 09:02:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 31359 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2011 09:02:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-iy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.210.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:01:54 +0000 Received: by iyl8 with SMTP id 8so1933976iyl.0 for ; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 02:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.62.200 with SMTP id y8mr1517485ibh.89.1310115712833; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 02:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [210.32.8.144] ([210.32.8.144]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m18sm1952022ibc.28.2011.07.08.02.01.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Jul 2011 02:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E16C691.9040408@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:02:00 -0000 From: Asm warrior User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.2.91 available for testing References: <20110706231348.GA14502@adacore.com> <4E154171.1010603@gmail.com> <4E157349.5000609@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4E157349.5000609@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 On 2011-7-7 16:50, Yao Qi wrote: > The problem is still there because patch is not reviewed at all.:) > > Your patch introduced some unnecessary changes, please remove them, and > patch can be shorter. Please revise your patch again, and send it > gdb-patches@ for review. I am not sure it can be in 7.3 release, but it > can be in trunk, hopefully. Thanks, but in-fact, the patch can be trivial. look at this post: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-06/msg00076.html So, mostly I believe Keith Seitz will fix it soon as he said, otherwise, setting breaking point on Windows will be broken. asmwarrior