From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-38773-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5368 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2011 19:41:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 5357 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2011 19:41:08 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:41:04 +0000
Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124])	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C205D390D1;	Wed,  2 Mar 2011 11:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7170C9F82;	Wed,  2 Mar 2011 11:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D6E9D4D.1070108@vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:41:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: question, xmalloc and gdbserver?
References: <4D6D8067.9090802@vmware.com> <201103020940.21789.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4D6E8D00.5000304@vmware.com> <201103021844.53202.pedro@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <201103021844.53202.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 March 2011 18:31:28, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> OK, so you're saying that all "legitimate" calls to malloc
>> will be checked?
> 
> Yes.
> 

Well, here's the one I'm thinking of.  It's not clear to me
what to do in case of error.  What do you think?

/* Put a stop reply to the stop reply queue.  */

static void
queue_stop_reply (ptid_t ptid, struct target_waitstatus *status)
{
   struct vstop_notif *new_notif;

   new_notif = malloc (sizeof (*new_notif));
   new_notif->next = NULL;
   new_notif->ptid = ptid;
   new_notif->status = *status;

[...]