From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29529 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2011 18:08:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 29518 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2011 18:08:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:08:26 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755B84B001; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:08:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C28CD99A; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:08:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D5C1299.2060502@vmware.com> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:08:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paawan oza CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: debugging gdb using gdb References: <810666.91200.qm@web112518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <810666.91200.qm@web112518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 paawan oza wrote: > Hi, > > during reversible implementation, I am trying to debug arm-gdb using arm-gdb. > so i connect through telnet terminal and open two different terminals. > and run both the gdb on target and attach the one gdb with another one. > the moment I attach another gdb and give continue command, the gdb being > debugged, looses iis terminal, and I am not able to type anything, and gdb does > not accept any keyboard input and it hangs. > > Regards, > Oza. What happens if you try the same thing on x86 linux?