From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29214 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2011 01:26:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 29206 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2011 01:26:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 01:26:21 +0000 Received: from mailhost2.vmware.com (mailhost2.vmware.com [10.16.67.167]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D8A30039; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:26:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E4A8EBB8; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:26:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D2FA63B.4000000@vmware.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 01:26:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Froyd CC: Joel Brobecker , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Question re: testsuite, "isnative", "is_remote" etc. References: <4D2E35C5.60206@vmware.com> <20110113184025.GO6247@codesourcery.com> <4D2F4CA9.1010105@vmware.com> <20110113193211.GO2518@adacore.com> <4D2F5881.4020703@vmware.com> <20110113205311.GP2518@adacore.com> <4D2F67A5.20000@vmware.com> <20110113210048.GV6247@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <20110113210048.GV6247@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 Nathan Froyd wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:59:17PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: >> The thing is, the situation is the same as now. We either have to >> put "isremote" in our board file (as now), or replace it by putting >> "use_gdb_stub" in our board file. >> >> A lot of changed tests for, as I see it, no benefit. > > You'll endlessly modify comments and reformat strings, but you won't run > a one-liner perl script over the testsuite? ;) It's exchanging one user-settable flag for another. I don't see the point. Besides, I don't do perl. ;-)