From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3651 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2010 20:05:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 3641 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Dec 2010 20:05:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:05:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBRK5SP3028631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:05:28 -0500 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBRK5P5t023748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:05:27 -0500 Message-ID: <4D18F185.6000304@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:05:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab CC: viju vincent , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Issue with printing binary operator overloaded function on GDB 7.2 References: <4D18EB0D.5080200@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 On 12/27/2010 11:44 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> FWIW, I've tried CVS head with the following GCCs: 4.4.5 20101112 (Red Hat >> 4.4.5-2), 4.6.0 20101227 (experimental), and 4.5.2 (GCC), and none of them >> exhibit the problem (cpexprs.exp passes as I expect it to). > > See. Excellent! I tried searching, but either I gave up to early or my searchfu is seriously degraded during the holidays... Thanks! Keith