From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-37930-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5120 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2010 19:03:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 5033 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Aug 2010 19:03:14 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:03:08 +0000
Received: from mailhost2.vmware.com (mailhost2.vmware.com [10.16.67.167])	by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB86826006;	Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AB78E677;	Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C7D51EA.9020701@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:03:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100702)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>,  Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: Different output from -gdb-show than show
References: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC571703485B@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <201008311629.12479.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4C7D4AED.1090000@vmware.com> <201008311940.55038.pedro@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <201008311940.55038.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010 19:33:17, Michael Snyder wrote:
> 
>> Would this be suitable?
> 
> You also need to reset exec_direction back from execution_direction 
> in set_exec_direction_func.  The set command callbacks are called _after_
> their controlled variable has already been changed.  See
> infrun.c:set_non_stop, for example.
> 

Hmmm, but "exec_direction" doesn't actually seem to be used anywhere.

I did try this patch, and after failing to set "reverse", it
still shows "Forward".

What am I missing?