From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32415 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2010 15:17:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 32405 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2010 15:17:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:17:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 28137 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2010 15:17:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO macbook-2.local) (stan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 2 Aug 2010 15:17:10 -0000 Message-ID: <4C56E170.5090103@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:17:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: Marc Khouzam , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Command for number of cores References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 Doug Evans wrote: > I hesitate to add "info cores" because it seems a bit esoteric, and > you'd have to hack gdb, gdbserver, and document it all when "remote > get" could suffice. > How about an "info arch cores"? We have "info os " that is extensible in a OS-specific way, but I would think number of cores is more a property of the architecture than of the OS (although they do interact). Curious that we don't have an "info arch" already - have we really never needed random arch info before? Stan