From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Brian Heilig <bheilig@etinternational.com>
Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Porting gdb to Cyclops64
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C530B30.1000603@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280510022.1560.20.camel@random>
Brian Heilig wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> My name is Brian Heilig and I am porting gdb 7.1-90 to the Cyclops64
> architecture. Cyclops64 has 80 cores and each core has 2 thread units
> for a total of 160 threads units, all running in parallel. Each thread
> unit executes the same code and can access shared memory or its own
> thread memory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPMD). A traditional thread
> model is also supported where SPMD threads can spawn other threads.
>
> I have integrated a gdb server into our kernel and integrated the target
> architecture into the gdb client. Right now I can remote debug a program
> on the target but it doesn't handle multiple threads well.
>
> When multiple threads are stopped at a breakpoint (or stopped for some
> other reason) I should be able to step through the current thread. When
> I do gdb is commanding the target to step the current thread and
> continue all others like "$vCont;s:1;c".
>
> The plan is to step the current thread and leave all others stopped
> until I tell it to continue. If multiple threads stop at a breakpoint
> then the target will queue these events. When the target is told to
> continue it will notify the client that the next thread has stopped at a
> breakpoint. If the user desires they can switch to another thread that
> is stopped and step it.
>
> Does gdb support the operation 'step the current thread and leave all
> other threads stopped'? Is there some mode or variable I need to set in
> the target architecture description to enable this? What is gdb's
> behavior now for multi-core architectures?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
Yes, see "set scheduler-locking".
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/gdb/thread-stops.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-30 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-30 17:13 Brian Heilig
2010-07-30 17:26 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2010-07-30 18:53 ` Brian Heilig
2010-07-30 18:57 ` Michael Snyder
2010-07-30 20:28 ` Brian Heilig
2010-07-30 22:54 ` Michael Snyder
2010-07-30 23:18 ` Pedro Alves
2010-08-02 13:25 ` Brian Heilig
2010-08-02 13:35 ` Pedro Alves
2010-08-03 16:52 ` Brian Heilig
2010-08-05 13:56 ` Brian Heilig
2010-08-05 14:19 ` Pedro Alves
2010-08-06 18:39 ` Problems with non-stop - " Brian Heilig
2010-08-30 19:44 ` Cyclops64 Multi-Process Brian Heilig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C530B30.1000603@vmware.com \
--to=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=bheilig@etinternational.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox