From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15133 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2010 12:45:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 15123 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2010 12:45:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f225.google.com) (209.85.218.225) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:45:03 +0000 Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so3046846bwz.8 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 05:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.22.9 with SMTP id l9mr4368723bkb.49.1270471499180; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 05:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a11sm105635836bkc.3.2010.04.05.05.44.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 05 Apr 2010 05:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BB9DFAC.6040306@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:45:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Howarth CC: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: cloog/ppl/mpc and gdb? References: <20100404214415.GA16054@bromo.med.uc.edu> <20100404214946.GK4271@adacore.com> <20100404220725.GA16129@bromo.med.uc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20100404220725.GA16129@bromo.med.uc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On 04/04/2010 23:07, Jack Howarth wrote: > the fink cloog package is installed. However, I am trying to > find out if this is all just noise from configure (in that > nothing in a stock build of gdb seems to end up linked against > cloog). Yeah, it's just noise, binutils has them too. I'm pretty sure they're only in top-level configure because gcc needs them, but that means they're there for everything because top-level configure is shared everywhere. They'll just be irrelevant anywhere you don't find references to them in the lower-level configure/Makefiles. cheers, DaveK