From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23159 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2010 01:59:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 22932 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2010 01:59:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-gw0-f41.google.com) (74.125.83.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:59:50 +0000 Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so474599gwb.0 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.28.19 with SMTP id b19mr238195anb.75.1268791188092; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.157.198] ([61.164.42.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm1307001ywc.56.2010.03.16.18.59.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BA03709.6070702@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:59:00 -0000 From: Asm_gmail User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb-7.1 - last call before release (Wed, Mar 17th) References: <20100316161124.GE3844@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20100316161124.GE3844@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 On 2010-3-17 0:11, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > As far as I know, we don't have any known blocking issue on the gdb-7.1 > branch, so I'm planning on creating the release tomorrow morning, > Pacific time. > > Please let me know if there is anything that you think should be included > before we release. > > Thanks, and I have built the GNU gdb (GDB) 7.0.90.20100316 version of gdb in Windows XP, MinGW. It works quite well under Codeblocks IDE. But it seems the command interpreter is still a little slower than the 7.0.1 version. As I have reported this issue in this maillist before. Sorry I can't compile it with -pg option. see here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2010-03/msg00029.html regards asmwarrior