From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5101 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2010 05:10:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 5092 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2010 05:10:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (HELO nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com) (61.9.168.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:10:15 +0000 Received: from nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com ([58.172.130.100]) by nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (InterMail vM.7.05.02.08 201-2174-114-118-20080528) with ESMTP id <20100316051012.FSOC1835.nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:10:12 +0000 Received: from kiwi.contemporary.net.au ([58.172.130.100]) by nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20100316051011.ZYIC1945.nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com@kiwi.contemporary.net.au>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:10:11 +0000 Received: from [172.16.100.166] (lapdog.contemporary.net.au [172.16.100.166]) by kiwi.contemporary.net.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o2G5AArS023022; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:10:11 +1100 Message-ID: <4B9F12B2.4030106@contemporary.net.au> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:10:00 -0000 From: Chris Johns User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tromey@redhat.com CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Python Pretty printing a struct References: <4B997F28.4050602@contemporary.net.au> <4B9D73C2.9090307@contemporary.net.au> <4B9EBA17.6070806@contemporary.net.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150201.4B9F12B4.0081,ss=1,fgs=0 X-SIH-MSG-ID: rx07GdL8TAD0zmQv0WC2OwV0yArkq3Qt8ZoaRdJjqwQZT0bduMHeU67mJrM8kMz21ThcNh+PP2EqYq70X4/QsuM= X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 On 16/03/2010 1:17 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > I think we should at least look at, and probably support, both the case > where this method is missing, and the case where this method returns > None. Could you file a PR for that? Bug #1181. Thanks Chris