From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29108 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2009 22:28:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 29099 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2009 22:28:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from intrepid.intrepid.com (HELO mail.intrepid.com) (74.95.8.113) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:28:18 +0000 Received: from [10.10.1.24] (n.local [10.10.1.24]) by mail.intrepid.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nBMMSG3i020245 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:28:16 -0800 Message-ID: <4B314802.3040405@intrepid.com> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:28:00 -0000 From: Nenad Vukicevic User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb 7.0.1 - non-stop and/or detach-on-fork not working References: <4B3134EF.6020409@intrepid.com> In-Reply-To: <4B3134EF.6020409@intrepid.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 Sorry for the mistake. I upgraded instead to the latest snapshot and everything is in order. Nenad On 12/22/2009 1:06 PM, Nenad Vukicevic wrote: > Has there been any change in this area since 7.0.50 12/02/09 snapshot? > > I am using these options: > > set target-async on > set non-stop on > set detach-on-fork off > > and have a simple app that forks two processes. 7.0.1 fails to break on > already established breakpoints. > > Any idea what might went wrong? > > Nenad > > Here are the logs from 7.0.50 and 7.0.1 runs: > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > gdb-7.0.50.20091202 > > Breakpoint 1 at 0x4006c3: file t.c, line 55. > Breakpoint 2 at 0x40062c: file t.c, line 11. > Breakpoint 3 at 0x400653: file t.c, line 25. > Breakpoint 4 at 0x4006af: file t.c, line 48. > (gdb) r > Starting program: /a/gdb-7.0.50.20091202/wrk/gdb/test/t > > Breakpoint 1, main () at t.c:55 > 55 int cnt = 0; > (gdb) c > Continuing. > Start... > [New process 5719] > Created 5719 > > Breakpoint 2, child_proc1 () at t.c:11 > 11 int cnt = 0; > (gdb) [New process 5720] > Created 5720 > > Breakpoint 3, child_proc2 () at t.c:25 > 25 int cnt = 0; > > Breakpoint 4, main_proc () at t.c:48 > 48 sleep(1000); > info threads > 3 process 5720 child_proc2 () at t.c:25 > 2 process 5719 child_proc1 () at t.c:11 > * 1 process 5689 main_proc () at t.c:48 > (gdb) info breakpoints > Num Type Disp Enb Address What > 1 breakpoint keep y > breakpoint already hit 1 time > 1.1 y 0x00000000004006c3 in main at t.c:55 > inf 3 > 1.2 y 0x00000000004006c3 in main at t.c:55 > inf 2 > 1.3 y 0x00000000004006c3 in main at t.c:55 > inf 1 > 2 breakpoint keep y > breakpoint already hit 1 time > 2.1 y 0x000000000040062c in child_proc1 at > t.c:11 inf 3 > 2.2 y 0x000000000040062c in child_proc1 at > t.c:11 inf 2 > 2.3 y 0x000000000040062c in child_proc1 at > t.c:11 inf 1 > 3 breakpoint keep y > breakpoint already hit 1 time > 3.1 y 0x0000000000400653 in child_proc2 at > t.c:25 inf 3 > 3.2 y 0x0000000000400653 in child_proc2 at > t.c:25 inf 2 > 3.3 y 0x0000000000400653 in child_proc2 at > t.c:25 inf 1 > 4 breakpoint keep y > breakpoint already hit 1 time > 4.1 y 0x00000000004006af in main_proc at > t.c:48 inf 3 > 4.2 y 0x00000000004006af in main_proc at > t.c:48 inf 2 > 4.3 y 0x00000000004006af in main_proc at > t.c:48 inf > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > gdb-7.0.1 > > Breakpoint 1 at 0x4006c3: file t.c, line 55. > Breakpoint 2 at 0x40062c: file t.c, line 11. > Breakpoint 3 at 0x400653: file t.c, line 25. > Breakpoint 4 at 0x4006af: file t.c, line 48. > (gdb) r > Starting program: /a/gdb-7.0.1/wrk/gdb/test/t > > Breakpoint 1, main () at t.c:55 > 55 int cnt = 0; > (gdb) c& > Continuing. > (gdb) Start... > [New process 10321] > Created 10321 > [New process 10322] > Created 10322 > > Breakpoint 4, main_proc () at t.c:48 > 48 sleep(1000); > info threads > 3 process 10322 0x0000003db44a42d6 in fork () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > 2 process 10321 0x0000003db44a42d6 in fork () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > * 1 process 10291 main_proc () at t.c:48 > (gdb) info break > Num Type Disp Enb Address What > 1 breakpoint keep y 0x00000000004006c3 in main at t.c:55 > breakpoint already hit 1 time > 2 breakpoint keep y 0x000000000040062c in child_proc1 at > t.c:11 > 3 breakpoint keep y 0x0000000000400653 in child_proc2 at > t.c:25 > 4 breakpoint keep y 0x00000000004006af in main_proc at t.c:48 > breakpoint already hit 1 time > (gdb) thread apply all c > > Thread 3 (process 10322): > Continuing. > > Thread 2 (process 10321): > Continuing. > > Thread 1 (process 10291): > Continuing. > ^C > Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. > 0x0000003db44a41b0 in __nanosleep_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > (gdb) > Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. > 0x0000003db44a41b0 in __nanosleep_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > > Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. > 0x0000003db44a41b0 in __nanosleep_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > info thread > 3 process 10322 0x0000003db44a41b0 in __nanosleep_nocancel () from > /lib64/libc.so.6 > 2 process 10321 0x0000003db44a41b0 in __nanosleep_nocancel () from > /lib64/libc.so.6 > * 1 process 10291 0x0000003db44a41b0 in __nanosleep_nocancel () from > /lib64/libc.so.6 > (gdb) info break > Num Type Disp Enb Address What > 1 breakpoint keep y 0x00000000004006c3 in main at t.c:55 > breakpoint already hit 1 time > 2 breakpoint keep y 0x000000000040062c in child_proc1 at > t.c:11 > 3 breakpoint keep y 0x0000000000400653 in child_proc2 at > t.c:25 > 4 breakpoint keep y 0x00000000004006af in main_proc at t.c:48 > breakpoint already hit 1 time > (gdb)