From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-36483-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3210 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2009 20:03:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 2997 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2009 20:03:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:02:58 +0000
Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) 	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3459E1D02E; 	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) 	by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293FACD90C; 	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B2A8DE9.5050200@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:03:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20090624)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
CC: 'Sean Chen' <sean.chen1234@gmail.com>,   'Greg Law' <glaw@undo-software.com>,  'Hui Zhu' <teawater@gmail.com>,   "'gdb@sourceware.org'" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: UndoDB's performance
References: <5e81cb500912040734u5ce67afdpd6a2d0e63173f908@mail.gmail.com>  	 <daef60380912140314if0ecb07i7857e4f133ff0d66@mail.gmail.com>  	 <5e81cb500912140518r2ad3f2fdrd0dd5a546e6d8a33@mail.gmail.com>  	 <daef60380912140707u279d169fpbb2096c1b03876af@mail.gmail.com>  	 <5e81cb500912141840s389859c2r9c56dd8800adb731@mail.gmail.com>  	 <daef60380912141956y2c5ee83dof731c48de5c4fa3b@mail.gmail.com>  	 <5e81cb500912142326t1bd545ek9180661d8bac10fe@mail.gmail.com>  	 <4B2752C6.4050804@undo-software.com>  	 <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC515C66CA56@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>  <5e81cb500912161826j290a3650o999af91f93d4bddf@mail.gmail.com> <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC515C6AD2F1@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC515C6AD2F1@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2

Marc Khouzam wrote:
> 
> My results did seem suspiciously good.  Trying things again, I don't
> get the same results at all.  I don't remember my exact orginal test,
> but I know PRecord had a problem with recursion, maybe that is what
> skewed the results?  

That problem with recursion was actually in gdb core, not in precord.
As long as you're just executing (ie. not reverse-stepping) it would
never have showed up.

(and it's fixed now).