From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31066 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2009 18:53:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 31058 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2009 18:53:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:53:42 +0000 Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62B241068; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA8EC9A47; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:53:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B1EA08E.6080704@vmware.com> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:53:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20090624) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: "tromey@redhat.com" , Joel Brobecker , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Red Hat PIE patch References: <4B1A9FA4.7000001@vmware.com> <20091205193211.GK2903@adacore.com> <4B1D7C69.70409@vmware.com> <20091208135643.GA26066@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20091208135643.GA26066@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >> Just FYI, I've applied the patches and done basic "aliveness" >> testing. They do seem to work for me, and I will be doing more >> with them so I may have further testing words later. > > Thanks, BTW there are now some add-ons to that series which are still not > properly split/integrated/reposted. > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/rpms/gdb/F-12/gdb-archer-pie-addons.patch?content-type=text%2Fplain&view=co Out of pure self-interest, I would love to see this work finalized and merged / checked in. I suddenly have a user base who depend heavily on PIE. Michael (mmmmmmm.... PIE good....)