From: Marcelo Taube <mail.marcelo.taube@gmail.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Some feedback about the python scripting feature
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF8993D.2050507@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF898F3.50908@gmail.com>
Dear gdb team,
I have been using the python scripting feature of gdb7
The feature is great it let me debug my code much better and in a much
flexible way.
There are some features missing which would improve it even more, though.
I want to mention them in case noone did it before.
* *calling functions*: From regular gdb command line the user can
allways simply do " p foo()" to call function and print the
result, it would be usefull to be able to call C functions (or the
debugged lenguage) from python and get the result as a Value
object in the same way a variable is accessed.
* *equality of types: *i think there are problems with the equality
of types in gdb. Look at the case that two type objects were
obtained and represent the same type, the expression
'gdb.lookup_type("int") == gdb.lookup_type("int")' now returns
false but it should return true.
* *interactive python: *the current python command reads lines using
gdb normal input instead of the regular python prompt line, making
some nice features of python unavailable like
completions-proposals (pressing the tab-key to get the name of a
function completed) or auto indentation. Maybe running the regular
python prompt line can be an option.
* *regular members instead of dictionaries: *it would be more
natural to have members of structs be accessed in their natural
way like in c. For example if we have some struct "struct Type {
int a; int b;}" and we have a value object in python called
'value', Now to access 'value.a' we have to do 'value["a"]' but
that feels preety unnatural, why not just support the syntax
'value.a' ?
Thank you so much for your excelent work and for the time you spent
reading this lines
Marcelo
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4AF898F3.50908@gmail.com>
2009-11-10 8:06 ` Marcelo Taube [this message]
2009-11-10 15:12 ` Phil Muldoon
2009-11-10 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-10 16:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-10 20:49 ` Marcelo Taube
2009-11-11 2:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-13 21:37 ` scott snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AF8993D.2050507@gmail.com \
--to=mail.marcelo.taube@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox