Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Taube <mail.marcelo.taube@gmail.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Some feedback about the python scripting feature
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF8993D.2050507@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF898F3.50908@gmail.com>

Dear gdb team,

I have been using the python scripting feature of gdb7

The feature is great it let me debug my code much better and in a much 
flexible way.

There are some features missing which would improve it even more, though.

I want to mention them in case noone did it before.

    * *calling functions*: From regular gdb command line the user can
      allways simply do " p foo()" to call function and print the
      result, it would be usefull to be able to call C functions (or the
      debugged lenguage) from python and get the result as a Value
      object in the same way a variable is accessed.
    * *equality of types: *i think there are problems with the equality
      of types in gdb. Look at the case that  two type objects were
      obtained and represent the same type, the expression
      'gdb.lookup_type("int") == gdb.lookup_type("int")' now returns
      false but it should return true.
    * *interactive python: *the current python command reads lines using
      gdb normal input instead of the regular python prompt line, making
      some nice features of python unavailable like
      completions-proposals (pressing the tab-key to get the name of a
      function completed) or auto indentation. Maybe running the regular
      python prompt line can be an option.
    * *regular members instead of dictionaries: *it would be more
      natural to have members of structs be accessed in their natural
      way like in c. For example if we have some struct "struct Type {
      int a; int b;}" and we have a value object in python called
      'value', Now to access 'value.a' we have to do 'value["a"]' but
      that feels preety unnatural, why not just support the syntax
      'value.a' ?

Thank you so much for your excelent work and for the time you spent 
reading this lines
Marcelo


       reply	other threads:[~2009-11-09 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4AF898F3.50908@gmail.com>
2009-11-10  8:06 ` Marcelo Taube [this message]
2009-11-10 15:12   ` Phil Muldoon
2009-11-10 15:38   ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-10 16:53     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-10 20:49       ` Marcelo Taube
2009-11-11  2:00         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-13 21:37       ` scott snyder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF8993D.2050507@gmail.com \
    --to=mail.marcelo.taube@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox