From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-36019-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7277 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2009 04:01:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 7129 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2009 04:01:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 04:01:39 +0000
Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124]) 	by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C946E1306C; 	Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) 	by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF4FC9B89; 	Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4ADA91C4.7010106@vmware.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:18:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jiang Jilin <freephp@gmail.com>
CC: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>, burlen <burlen.loring@gmail.com>,   "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: reverse execution
References: <4AD8D8DC.2080904@gmail.com> <7d77a27d0910171802uc09fd78s79c7e9a00fda258b@mail.gmail.com> 	<daef60380910171945n1354b6bmb0ddf2a3dce80e59@mail.gmail.com> <7d77a27d0910172018t4622738cn993de6472679078a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7d77a27d0910172018t4622738cn993de6472679078a@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2

Jiang Jilin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Jilin,
>>
>> Sorry I made a mistake when we told about it.  I want to say 0xf10
>> series insn (they seems called sse insn), but I said mmx insn.
> 
> Aha, I misunderstood what you said. I take a glance at the specific and
> find they are relevant with mmx, so you are right. :)
> 
>> These 0xf10 insn seems control the xmm reg, you can see the values of
>> these reg whith gdb cmd "info info all-registers".
> 
> Yeah, It seems I cannot delay the work for mmx insn. :)

Don't forget that Paawan Oza has already said he was going to
work on the reverse MMX support.  Wouldn't want to see you two
guys duplicating effort...