magnitude spelled wrong in sim

[Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 450 bytes --]

Hi,

As a side-effect of looking at the sparc comments,
I spotted a couple of times magnitude was spelled
incorrectly.  Diffs and ChangeLog entries attached.

mag1 is in sim/common.
mag2 is in sim/ppc.

Thanks.

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
   Support Available             (256) 722-9985



[-- Attachment #2: mag1.ChangeLog --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 93 bytes --]

2009-10-15  Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com>

	* sim-inline.h: Fix spelling error.


[-- Attachment #3: mag1.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 683 bytes --]

Index: sim-inline.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/sim/common/sim-inline.h,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 sim-inline.h
--- sim-inline.h	14 Jan 2009 10:53:06 -0000	1.6
+++ sim-inline.h	15 Oct 2009 13:28:50 -0000
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
    eliminate the overhead of function calls and (as a consequence)
    also eliminate further dead code.
 
-   On a CISC (x86) I've found that I can achieve an order of magintude
+   On a CISC (x86) I've found that I can achieve an order of magnitude
    speed improvement (x3-x5).  In the case of RISC (sparc) while the
    performance gain isn't as great it is still significant.
 

[-- Attachment #4: mag2.ChangeLog --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 93 bytes --]

2009-10-15  Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com>

	* std-config.h: Fix spelling error.


[-- Attachment #5: mag2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 690 bytes --]

Index: std-config.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/sim/ppc/std-config.h,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 std-config.h
--- std-config.h	25 Feb 2002 02:13:10 -0000	1.3
+++ std-config.h	15 Oct 2009 13:29:38 -0000
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@
    to both eliminate the overhead of function calls and (as a
    consequence) also eliminate further dead code.
 
-   On a CISC (x86) I've found that I can achieve an order of magintude
+   On a CISC (x86) I've found that I can achieve an order of magnitude
    speed improvement (x3-x5).  In the case of RISC (sparc) while the
    performance gain isn't as great it is still significant.