From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2246 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2009 18:45:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 2060 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2009 18:45:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk (HELO smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk) (212.23.3.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:45:20 +0000 Received: from [82.71.15.62] (helo=[192.168.123.72]) by smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (SSL 3.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MxmN3-0004BH-82; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:45:17 +0000 Message-ID: <4AD4CABC.3060202@undo-software.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:45:00 -0000 From: Greg Law User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Process record -- save and restore to a file References: <4AD35518.9040606@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4AD35518.9040606@vmware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Smarthost02-IP: [82.71.15.62] Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 Michael Snyder wrote: > [..] > > Secondly, I have a suggestion about the command names. > How about > record save > record restore > instead of > record dump > record load > > What do you guys think? UI looks good to me, too. Would we expect these commands to be reflected over the remote protocol if a remote target were using reverse debugging? Greg -- Greg Law, Undo Software http://undo-software.com/