From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5617 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2009 02:24:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 5605 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2009 02:24:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f216.google.com) (209.85.219.216) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:24:20 +0000 Received: by ewy12 with SMTP id 12so230719ewy.24 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.211.146.39 with SMTP id y39mr4117523ebn.65.1255141457500; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm1365547eyz.0.2009.10.09.19.24.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ACFF3C7.3030802@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:24:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused References: <4ACFD8B7.4090902@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4ACFD8B7.4090902@vmware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00188.txt.bz2 Michael Snyder wrote: > ir.rm != ir.rex_b; > So, for discussion, should we remove -Wno-unused? Or append "-Wunused-value"? cheers, DaveK