From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26789 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2009 17:34:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 26781 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2009 17:34:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:34:44 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3475A5300F; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2473DCDA4E; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ACB7ED2.2060803@vmware.com> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:34:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Potential problem between non-stop and linux-thread-db References: <4ACA9270.3020205@vmware.com> <200910060149.26230.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200910060149.26230.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Tuesday 06 October 2009 01:42:24, Michael Snyder wrote: > >> These were written under the "all-stop" convention, but the comments >> are no longer true, is it not so? >> >> So, async/nonstop guys -- do we need to do anything about this? > > AFAIK, these callbacks weren't really used by glibc. Has that > changed recently? Probably not. I was just looking at the code, not actually running or debugging it.