From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3277 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2009 11:20:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 3264 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Oct 2009 11:20:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mout0.freenet.de (HELO mout0.freenet.de) (195.4.92.90) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:19:58 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.25] (helo=15.mx.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID ralf.corsepius@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #92) id 1MtJhG-0002lO-TD; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:19:42 +0200 Received: from hsi-kbw-078-043-063-233.hsi4.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([78.43.63.233]:60201 helo=[192.168.1.104]) by 15.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID ralf.corsepius@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1MtJhG-0003RB-MQ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:19:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4AC4904C.8040204@rtems.org> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:20:00 -0000 From: Ralf Corsepius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Ralf Corsepius , Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Subject: Re: GDB 6.8.92 available for testing References: <20090930204828.GB31446@adacore.com> <4AC41F44.1040502@rtems.org> <20091001100900.GA16002@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20091001100900.GA16002@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 On 10/01/2009 12:09 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:17:24 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> --enable-system-readline also is still broken (Jan, please submit >> your gdb-readline-6.0.patch you have applied to Fedora's gdb). > > * I do not consider it appropriate for FSF GDB as the Fedora patch is just > a hack, GDB should not make references to readline internal variables. Agreed, but isn't the actual hackish part in gdb? > * FSF GDB does build with the default options. Dependencies on external > libraries are a task of distro vendors and the distros already contain GDB > patches on their own. You are forgetting about the 3rd parties, which apply distros as their basis. Ralf