From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20489 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2009 23:05:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 20481 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2009 23:05:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:05:15 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D8D1500B; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E601CD902; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A95BFDC.5060803@vmware.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:35:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Doug Evans , Anirban Sinha , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: when is gdb 6.9 being released? References: <4A8C7EA8.4010808@vmware.com> <20090820022048.GD5319@adacore.com> <20090826024108.GB6540@adacore.com> <20090826221731.GD6540@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20090826221731.GD6540@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > (I will be back home and back at work on Saturday) > >> I'd just like to see the community get a definitive date to set >> expectations and help folks schedule their time (for those that it >> would help). > > I guess we can try to set a new target date if it helps others, > but I have been reluctant to do that because I don't want us to > have to wait for that target date in the off chance that we might > be ready before that date. That being said, if the community would > prefer having a date, that will be fine too! Just set it to the earliest you think we (and you) will possibly be ready -- and then let it slip if necessary. Michael (wearing my evil manager's hat)