From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27504 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2009 06:51:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 27478 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2009 06:51:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f220.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f220.google.com) (209.85.220.220) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:51:37 +0000 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so3567758fxm.0 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.151.83 with SMTP id b19mr4555706bkw.102.1250664694200; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com ([85.93.118.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 19sm7758917fkr.25.2009.08.18.23.51.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A8BA0F3.5000804@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:07:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lance Taylor CC: Ralf Wildenhues , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src References: <20090816150957.GA24096@gmx.de> <20090816151338.GB24096@gmx.de> <4A88395D.803@gnu.org> <20090818184110.GC30742@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 On 08/19/2009 02:02 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Ralf Wildenhues writes: > >> The merge of toplevel synced files from GCC to src >> >> still doesn't have one small nod that I would like from a src maintainer: >> >> * Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:52:45PM CEST: >>>> - the files move from GPLv2 to GPLv3 header. Is that a problem for >>>> anything in src? >>> >>> I honestly don't know. > > I can't see why this would be a problem, as the GNU binutils and gdb > moved to GPLv3 some time ago. Great, I was not sure about that. Paolo